The
words of Joseph Addison: “When I look upon
the tombs of the great, every emotion of envy dies in me; when I read epitaphs
of the beautiful, every inordinate desire goes out; when I meet with the grief
of parents upon a tombstone, my heart melts with compassion; when I see the
tombs of parents themselves, I consider the vanity of grieving for those whom
we must quickly follow: when I see kings lying by those who deposed them, when
I consider the rival wits placed side by side, or the holy men that divided the
world with their contests and disputes, I reflect with sorrow and astonishment
on the little competitions, factions and debates of mankind. When I read the
several dates of the tombs of some that died yesterday, and some that died six
hundred years ago, I consider the great day when we shall all be
contemporaries, and make our appearance together”
Several
things have happened that have incessantly called us to listen to Fear and yet
we keep sliding away the fear just to find comfort in the very places where our
greatest fear(s) is.Every time we shut down the alarm to this call, we are
deliberately saying, “we hear but let’s
pause briefly and see what happens”. Really? Has that ever been a solution when
the call is so loud? That, I do not remember. If you don’t listen to Fear; toHistory; it comes back to haunt you. There is a
feel-good statement we often tell ourselves, “let bygones be bygones” but: at
times ,we ought to come face to face with
what history is telling us in the background or else we are bound to crippling
the last ounce of hope to the very bare
teething issues in our midst.
I
recently read that Andrew Mwenda at long last vowed to fight the FDC to the end
but if that’s the case, it’s just going to be one of the toughest vows he has
ever made, the teething issues are not just faced by this party. Since by
virtue of the fact that I am party to the FDC(a whole political party with many
subscribers), I am personally going to
throw away the kid gloves this time and we shall have a mature conversation at
the adults table—between Mwenda and I. Exhibits A,B,C&D show how
this is yet the most interesting journey of my role play in the swaggerific revolution-each
day I share my opinion on anything that unites this country and the world in
general, at the back of my mind I always
have the phenomenal Edith Wharton’s words:
“an air worth breathing is the air of ideas”.
Whether we disagree or not, please let’s keep interacting.
I
have attempted to think that we would get this finished by a round-table-talk
but I have had futile attempts—no one should say I didn’t try. A while ago, I
asked my friend Andrew whether we would meet again after a long time, he
screamed yes. Unfortunately, I was out of town and we scheduled to meet when I
was back. He had the chance to fool me (I at times think he did, since it was
April 1st, he told me we could meet up at his office but he flown
off to Boston—as per the intel he later gave me in a message)—I do not share
this story out of rage, I share it because I would respect Mwenda for us to
weigh in on the third alternative, synergy: that’s the worth of all that
effort, read on.
As
a university student, in my negotiation class and also the debates I had with
the law class (the Positivists and Naturalists debate), we were encouraged to
read Roger Fisher and William Ury’sbook, GETTING TO YES, I have since been in
the know of two things—the ‘principled approach’ versus the ‘positioned’
approach. Part of the aforementioned effort to have a one-one with Andrew
was brought into play by this book. I have unfortunately been made inactive,
may not meet soon since the ‘fight’ is on(much as I am hanging by the thread, I
am only interested in one fight with Andrew, the battlefield of ideas), that
leaves me with nothing but a choice of telling Andrew how I look at him today
and which may worsen tomorrow-read on.
‘I HAVE THEREFORE I AM Vs. I AM
BECAUSE WE ALL ARE’
Andrew
Mwenda is a mere political intermediary: He is a man whose besetting vices are
self-righteousness and reductionism; he under-estimates the force of political
passions—I have continually told him but he never listens but he wants to be
listened to: evidential proof herein.
He
wishes to enjoy the fruits of politics without paying the price or noticing the
pain(Dear Mwenda,does it ever come to your mind that being in prison in
a totalitarian regime is an occupational hazard for those who challenge it?).
He likes the fruit and not the tree; he wishes to pluck each fruit: liberty,
honesty in government, good Medicare, economic prosperity, employment for the
populace…. Etc. Thus by definition outside politics or he may think that
politics is simply the acts of political parties and politicians—thus narrowing
the scope of politics drastically and unrealistically. But steeply though he
draws such lines, he always leaves some place for politics. He merely tries to
scrub it down, clean it up and tether it firmly until the terrier becomes a
fairly lifeless, if respectable, lap-dog. Honestly, he is the guy whose last
act of betrayal reads: money is better business.
We
are here on earth to help each other, W.H.Audenironically
remarked, but what others are here for, only God knows. Let me shock you. I
knew Andrew because he was an outspoken journalist against the Museveni
government in the day. I am not sure Museveni answered his hurts, since all he
complained about have worsened today, but I can make some guesses. He visited
and still visits state house and Rwakitura—if you are unaware, this is a
brown-envelope insinuation I am making herein. The words of Dag Hammarskjold: “You
cannot play the animal in you without wholly becoming the animal, play with
falsehood without forfeiting your right to truth, play with cruelty without
losing your sensibility of mind. He who wants to keep his garden tidy doesn’t reserve
plot for weeds”. Simply put, there is something strange that must have
gone on with Andrew—just like junk food and lack of exercise can ruin an
athlete’s condition, so does the brown envelopes. If he still reads the bible,
I will leave the word of scripture in Phil 2:4: “Do not merely look for your personal interests but also the interests
of others”, thus sayeth the LORD.
I
have tried all possible ways to paint the picture for my friend Andrew but
failed - I thought of something that will possibly make it up to me, a fable from
the renowned educator R.H.REEVES, THE ANIMAL SCHOOL.PS:
Read with your heart, soul and mind, here we go:
“Once upon a time, the
animals decided they must do something heroic to meet the problems of a “New
World”, so they organized a school. They adopted an activity curriculum
consisting of running, climbing, swimming and flying. To make it easier to administer,
and all animals took all the subjects.
The duck was excellent
in swimming, better in fact than his instructor, and made excellent grades in
swimming, but he was very poor in running. Since he was low in running, he had
to stay after school and also drop swimming to practice running. This was kept
until his web feet were badly worn and he was only average in swimming. But
average was acceptable in school, so nobody worried about that except the dark.
The rabbit started at
the top of the class in running, but had a nervous breakdown because of so much
make-up in swimming.
The squirrel was
excellent in climbing until he developed frustrations in the flying class where
his teacher made him start from the ground up instead of the tree from
top-down. He also developed charley horses from over-exertion and he got a C n
climbing and a D in running.
The eagle was a
problem child and had to be disciplined severely. In climbing class he beat
all the others to the top of the tree, but he insisted on using his own way
of getting there.
At the end of the year,
an abnormal eel that could swim exceedingly well and could also run; climb and
fly a little had the highest average and was valedictorian.
The prairie dogs stayed
out of school and fought the tax levy because the administration would not add
up digging and burrowing to the curricullum.They apprenticed their children to
the badger and later joined the groundhogs and gophers to start a successful
private school”. THE END. My friend Andrew and
that disagree should be a very smart enough to interpret this fable. I will
leave it at that therefore.
Edwin Markham on the golden rule once
said: “we have committed to the golden rule by memory,
let us now commit it to life”. Basically, our country can’t get any
better if our leaders and the agents do not stop for a little while and pause
to question themselves into the other person’s shoe: Life’s
urgent and most persistent question, what are you doing for others?,Dr.King
once noted. Between now and the next time you read from me, Andrew, I am going
to believe that maybe you will be present to attune to beating down the single
story-syndrome as I earlier noted.
And for that one reason, if you have read that,ChimandaNgoziAdichiestays
on the list for people I can bank on. In the AMERICANAH, she says: “If you don’t understand, ask questions. If you are
uncomfortable asking questions, say you are uncomfortable about asking
questions and then ask anyway. It is easy to tell when a question is coming
from a good place. Then listen more. Sometimes people just want to be heard”.
PS: the worst form of ignorance is a closed mind.
If
I have over-stated the truth, please bear with me and forgive me and where I
lack the grain of truth, may the LORD find a way of putting it right. Sincerely:
GraceAbaho
Sr, INDEPENDENT BLOGGER.
HALLO
ReplyDeleteHOPE my mail finds you Dear Grace. I have seen yo blog so inspiring coz i have the text. I therefore request you that you add as yo follower so that we can keep interacting together.
Thank you.